The Green Screen

Full Version: Castro Essay Criticizes 2008 Candidates
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
Pages: 1 2
By ANITA SNOW
The Associated Press
Tuesday, August 28, 2007; 12:54 PM

HAVANA -- A new essay by ailing leader Fidel Castro accused U.S. presidential candidates of "submission" to his exiled foes in Florida and offered a favorable assessment of only one of the 10 presidents he has known: Jimmy Carter.

Candidates for the U.S. presidential election in 2008 "are totally absorbed by the Florida adventure," said the column published Tuesday by the Communist Party newspaper Granma and other official media.

It was signed by Castro, who has not been seen in videos since June 5.

Castro said that both Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama "feel the sacred duty to demand 'a democratic government in Cuba'" _ something Cuban officials insist already exists.

Obama last weekend called for loosening restrictions on how often Cuban-Americans can visit family on the island and how much money they can send them.

"It can help make their families less dependent on Fidel Castro. That's the way to bring about real change in Cuba," Obama told more than 1,000 people in Miami's Little Havana.

Clinton, a New York senator and the Democratic front-runner, last week reiterated her support for current U.S. policy: "Until it is clear what type of policies might come with a new (Cuban) government, we cannot talk about changes in the U.S. policies toward Cuba."

The column _ the second published so far this week _ made no reference to recent rumors that Castro had died or was dying. Nor did it reveal any information about his exact ailment or condition. Castro has not been seen in public in the 13 months since he announced he had undergone intestinal surgery and temporarily ceded power to his younger brother Raul.

Castro also described his relations with other U.S. presidents he had dealt with since 1959.

"I only knew one who for ethical-religious reasons was not complicit to the brutal terrorism against Cuba: James Carter," Tuesday's essay read _ though it noted that a law banning U.S. attempts to assassinate foreign leaders such as Castro took effect during Gerald Ford's administration.

Castro noted that Carter opened the U.S. Interests Section in Havana and supported an agreement on maritime limits.

Despite his efforts, Castro said, "the circumstances of that time impeded him from going further."

Castro said Bill Clinton was "really friendly" during a brief encounter at a U.N. summit and said he was "intelligent in demanding that rule of law be followed" in the case of castaway boy Elian Gonzalez, who was returned from the U.S. to Cuba in 2000 after an international custody battle.

He also acknowledged that Clinton apparently tried to stop flights by exile pilots who had enraged the communist government by repeatedly scattering anti-communist literature over Havana.

But he criticized Clinton for backing legislation to tighten the U.S. trade embargo after Cuban jet fighters shot down the civilian planes off the island's coast during a repeat visit in February 1996.

"It was an electoral year, and he took advantage of that," Castro said, noting that Clinton invited exile leaders to witness his signing of "the criminal law."
Well, Jimmy Carter was the only President Fidel could bully. Oh ok, he could also bully Clinton.

Anyhoo, dead men don't write.

Bogey

Mercy Wrote:Well, Jimmy Carter was the only President Fidel could bully. Oh ok, he could also bully Clinton.

Anyhoo, dead men don't write.


Fifo is very perceptive even for a nearly dead man.

he's also 100% correct in that Clinton was more or less politically forced into Helms-Burton because Basulto insisted on buzzing Havana while bragging,. you can't get us, you can't get us.

Then they did.

and it was supposedly a "crime" (in South Florida, anyways)

so tell me Mrs Lawyer, if I have a guard dog and you sneak unto the property, managing to escape and taunt the guarddog before the enraged dog got to you by leaping over the fence in time, but one time the dog either caught you on the fence, or got so pissed off it actually managed to get over the fence and maul your do, would I as the dog's owner be criminally responsible?
Yet another Reflection from the ghost(writer) of Fidel Castro:

http://www.granma.cu/INGLES/2007/agosto/...flex3.html

Bogey

havana-journal Wrote:Yet another Reflection from the ghost(writer) of Fidel Castro:

http://www.granma.cu/INGLES/2007/agosto/...flex3.html

I wish Fifo would write about rejecting Kissinger's offer that "he could not refuse" under Carter.

it was an offer to end the embargo, in turn Castro had to pledge to end his little "revolutionary adventures".

shortly thereafter, the Cubans got militarily involved in Angola.

so I'd love to hear what Fifo has to say about that one.

The "bloqueo" has always been far more useful for him politically and as a crutch, than been useful to the gringos
No matter how right or wrong Castro's analysis is (not interested in reading it at the moment, maybe soon), at least the US has "candidates". Which pretty much trumps his right to say anything. Simple comment on my part, but simply the truth.
If the dog jumps OVER THE FENCE and attacks me, you are in trouble. It is not your property anymore.

You are NOT in trouble if the incident occurred while the dog was confined to YOUR PROPERTY.

Get it straight buddy.

Bogey

Mercy Wrote:If the dog jumps OVER THE FENCE and attacks me, you are in trouble. It is not your property anymore.

You are NOT in trouble if the incident occurred while the dog was confined to YOUR PROPERTY.

Get it straight buddy.

yeah I understand that concept.

but what happens if you are outside of the fence taunting the dog?
and it gets an adrenaline rush and jumps the fence it otherwise may not have jumped?
You lost your case. The dog attacked outside of its boundaries. YOU are responsible for the dog and its actions.

If you no me cre, just look at any homeowners insurance policy and see if they will cover your dog's attack OUTSIDE of its boundaries.

That's why most insurance companies don't insure Pit Bulls.
Good example Mercy. You can't shoot someone down that has not attacked you in international waters bogs. The way to handle it is to seek legal relief from the country the plane is registered to which can be easily found on the tail fin.

Fidel's perspective has been twisted from the time he positioned himself as a socialist and turned into a Marxist-Leninist communist he still is today. He has outlasted our presidents because we have a constitution and term limits and also because he rules with an iron fist and has single handedly destroyeda beautiful island nation.

Fk Fidel....

Bogey

Quetz Wrote:Good example Mercy. You can't shoot someone down that has not attacked you in international waters bogs. The way to handle it is to seek legal relief from the country the plane is registered to which can be easily found on the tail fin.

Fidel's perspective has been twisted from the time he positioned himself as a socialist and turned into a Marxist-Leninist communist he still is today. He has outlasted our presidents because we have a constitution and term limits and also because he rules with an iron fist and has single handedly destroyeda beautiful island nation.

Fk Fidel....

there's actually some dispute as to whether they were or were not shot down in international waters.

there's little dispute they were actually in Cuba's territorial waters (and REPEATEDLY so) before finally getting shot down (that's what you get when you get on the radio in Miami and taunt a dictator)

they went looking for trouble, and then they found it.

then it's a lawsuit?? hahahahahaahhhaah give me a Fkg break.

Airman, re shooting down things in international waters.

remember the USS Vincennes and Iran Air Flight 655? (actually to make things better/worse,. the US later acknowledged that the Vincennes had crossed/fired from Iranian international waters, something they initially denied)

OOPS.

Action_smiley_060
Yeah, the dispute is on the side of Fidel and gang...."the bitch made me do it" is a much better argument.

Yeah flight 655 was shot down on Iranian air space and we admitted it, we apologized and explained the tragic mistake. That is how a civilized nation deals with a wartime error.

Tillman was shot in the head by our own soldiers, as are many friendly fire deaths that occur in any war. It's wartime and s*&t happens.

I am not sure when we were at war with Cuba but I am sure we were not at war with them in February of 1996. In fact the last war we were with Cuba was when we assisted them to get the Spaniards out of Cuba after many hundreds of years of occupation.
I forgot we compensated the Iranian government nearly $62 MM.
Yeah, the dispute is on the side of Fidel and gang...."the bitch made me do it" is a much better argument.

Yeah flight 655 was shot down on Iranian air space and we admitted it, we apologized and explained the tragic mistake. That is how a civilized nation deals with a wartime error.

Tillman was shot in the head by our own soldiers, as are many friendly fire deaths that occur in any war. It's wartime and s*&t happens.

I am not sure when we were at war with Cuba but I am sure we were not at war with them in February of 1996. In fact the last war we were with Cuba was when we assisted them to get the Spaniards out of Cuba after many hundreds of years of occupation.
Queetzie from another thread.....

"By the way, Fidel Castro endorses a Hilary/Obama ticket. Now you are in good company Bogs...or at least the company you deserve."

So what is really it Queetzie? Enlighten us, please, with your "know it all" wisdom.
Pages: 1 2
Reference URL's