The Green Screen

Full Version: A different view on the effect of a possible Obama win
You're currently viewing a stripped down version of our content. View the full version with proper formatting.
An Obama Victory Would Mean Significant Changes for Cuba and U.S. Latinos

Electing Barack Obama president could significantly change the balance of power in Cuba and among Latinos in the U.S. because Cuba would be forced to deal with the first American administration in decades poised to strengthen ties with the country's military government, the director of the University at Buffalo's Caribbean Studies Program said today.
"For the first time since President Eisenhower, the Castro brothers are becoming aware that come next year they might be dealing with a chief executive in Washington whose policy will be to reestablish dialogue leading to the normalization of relations between Washington and Havana," said Jose F. Buscaglia, associate professor of American studies and director of UB's Caribbean Studies Program.

Buscaglia, who has spent the past decade traveling with students to Cuba and who has extensive knowledge of the country's cultural geography and politics, said the prospect of Obama as president sends a "profound sense of unease into the darkest precincts of power in Havana." An Obama administration will be a "perilous threat" to the reigning military government now ruling Cuba, according to Buscaglia.

"Nothing could be more threatening to the long-held views of the Cuban 'comandantes' and generals, as well as to the institutions they have carefully developed over the last half century to keep their country under the tightest control," said Buscaglia.

Electing Obama, with his interest to open talks with the Cuban government, would be a more serious threat to the military elites who now control Cuba than the loss of Soviet aid in the early 1990s and the subsequent collapse of the island's economy, according to Buscaglia.

"Will the Castro brothers engineer a crisis to prevent the reestablishment of normal relations?" Buscaglia asked. "Will they be able to contain the people of Cuba, predominantly young and non-white, if they are attracted to a figure sitting in the Oval Office whose face will seem more familiar and whose vision will be all the more coherent than those of the elusive old men who rule their lives from a secret hospital room or a bunker in Havana?"

The U.S. broke relations with the Cuban government shortly after Fidel Castro became prime minister in 1959 following the overthrow of the Batista government. Since coming to power, the Bush administration has carried on an unprecedented set of measures intended to raise tensions and impede the normalization of relations with Havana, Buscaglia said.

Electing Republican candidate John McCain would send a different message to Cuba, Buscaglia said. McCain would continue to support the Bush doctrine of isolating Havana, especially since McCain seems to hold a particular grudge against the Castro brothers whose agents he still blames for some of the harshest interrogation methods used against him when he was a POW in Vietnam, Buscaglia said.

An Obama victory would be fundamentally different, Buscaglia said. It could also significantly change the power structure in what Buscaglia called the "Story of Two Cities" played out in the Miami-Havana connection.

After two consecutive elections won by George W. Bush with the support of the Cuban exile community in Florida, the wealthiest and politically most-powerful sector of the Latino community in the U.S. may stand to lose much clout in the power centers of what in Havana is known as the "monster" or the "empire," according to Buscaglia.

"An Obama victory could change the balance of power in favor of Chicano, Puerto Rican, and other Central and South American Spanish-speaking constituencies in the U.S. that are more liberal and populist than the often conservative and sometimes outright racist Cuba-American elites," said Buscaglia. "This would be no insignificant change as Latinos become the majority of the population of the country. It could set a new tone on internal political debates and it certainly would be a welcomed change for most of our neighbors in the hemisphere and indeed throughout the world."

Reported by University of Buffalo

http://www.huliq.com/1/71424/obama-victo...us-latinos
blah blah blah.....


AK
I am not against the progress of Cuba. I wish more than anything else for normalization of relations with Cuba.

Only not with the Castro brothers in power.

I don't see how you can sit down and negotiate with a regime that wanted to blow your do out of the water. Remember 1962?

In 1962 and 2008, you are still dealing with Fidel.

Some people just have no honor and pride.
Mercy times change 62 is a long time ago. China is making good with the US and they were cut off until '72. Big war in 50'. Russia is under new leadership but arguably just as bad as the Cold war and it is full speed ahead for business. The US was fighting in vietnam until 72 and now things are normal.

You make peace with enemies not friends

pblee

(Oct 30, 2008 04:28 PM)angelking Wrote: [ -> ]blah blah blah.....


AK

Good to see you continuing your brilliant responses. Getting a little worried about loosing your job. I hear there is a huge demand for airplanes buzzing around broadcasting nonsense.
(Oct 30, 2008 09:26 PM)pblee Wrote: [ -> ]
(Oct 30, 2008 04:28 PM)angelking Wrote: [ -> ]blah blah blah.....


AK

Good to see you continuing your brilliant responses. Getting a little worried about loosing your job. I hear there is a huge demand for airplanes buzzing around broadcasting nonsense.

LMAO.....I have "varied" experience.

AK

pblee

I wonder what other government handout you can find. Flying around Cuba is nothing more the a government handout to the Maimi Cubans to get their vote; plain and simple!
(Oct 31, 2008 12:07 AM)pblee Wrote: [ -> ]I wonder what other government handout you can find. Flying around Cuba is nothing more the a government handout to the Maimi Cubans to get their vote; plain and simple!

Well, you are welcome to your opinion.


AK
Gray. How many businesses and properties did the Americans lose in China? I don't know that history.

There is a difference between boycotting a person's goods and an embargo.

We do know what they lost in Cuba.

I don't make friends with enemies. I squash them. I ain't Jesus.

pblee

(Oct 31, 2008 11:53 AM)Mercy Wrote: [ -> ]Gray. How many businesses and properties did the Americans lose in China? I don't know that history.

There is a difference between boycotting a person's goods and an embargo.

We do know what they lost in Cuba.

I don't make friends with enemies. I squash them. I ain't Jesus.

I don't believe you ever have to say you ain't Jesus.
WTF is the "Bush Doctrine"?

Like either of the Bush's were president during the CMC.........

Unless my memory is failing me, JFK, a DEMOCRAT was president and started the "true" blockade of Cuba.

Since then, there's never been a real blockade.....except that imposed by Castro Inc. so that the Cuban people would know little to nothing about the outside world.

Man this is some really dumb s*&t.
Economic sanctions started with Eisenhower who stopped shipping weapons to Batista. Then he cut the sugar quota in response to nationalizations of US interests in Cuba after the revolution.

Kennedy "quarantined" Cuba as a tactic in the CMC because a "blockade" is an act of war and is as such a casus belli. That was lifted when the agreement was made with Krushchev.

But the travel ban and further economic sanctions date from Kennedy's administration after the CMC.
(Nov 03, 2008 05:19 PM)gray Wrote: [ -> ]Economic sanctions started with Eisenhower who stopped shipping weapons to Batista. Then he cut the sugar quota in response to nationalizations of US interests in Cuba after the revolution.

Kennedy "quarantined" Cuba as a tactic in the CMC because a "blockade" is an act of war and is as such a casus belli. That was lifted when the agreement was made with Krushchev.

But the travel ban and further economic sanctions date from Kennedy's administration after the CMC.

So, to sum it all up, it was the Democrats who put the travel restrictions that are still in place today.

I think there is more to that agreement than we are privy to.
Michel " Balloon King" Robinson said " Put me in coach I am ready to play - I have blond hair " !!!
(Nov 03, 2008 07:11 PM)Mercy Wrote: [ -> ]So, to sum it all up, it was the Democrats who put the travel restrictions that are still in place today.

I think there is more to that agreement than we are privy to.


Actually the travel restrictions were removed by Carter and reinstated by Reagan.
Reference URL's